Legal Opinion

White v. Shoup Boat Corporation

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 25, 1964No. 170PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.

The Legislature when it enacted our first Workmen’s Compensation Act anticipated employers and employees would, in most cases, be able to reach an agreement with respect to the employee’s right to compensation. Hence it inserted in the Act a provision authorizing such agreements when made in the manner prescribed by the Industrial Commission. G.S. 97-82. The wisdom of the statutory provision was referred to in Smith v. Red Cross, 245 N.C. 116, 95 S.E. 2d 559, decided in 1956. As there noted, more than 95% of all claims for compensation because of industrial injuries were disposed of by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pratt v. Central Upholstery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Smith v. Mecklenburg County Chapter American Red CrossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Ammons v. Z. A. Sneeden's Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Neal v. ClarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Beard v. Blumenthal Jewish HomeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  4. Willis v. J. M. Davis Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. HAND BY HAND v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API