Ammons v. Z. A. Sneeden's Sons, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
This case presents the question whether failure of the claimant to notify the Industrial Commission of a change in condition within 12 months from settlement deprives the Commission of jurisdiction; or whether the delay is intended as a bar to further proceedings. This Court, considering G.S. 97-47, held in Lee v. Rose’s, 205 N.C. 310, 171 S.E. 87: “The statute is plain and unambiguous, and no reason occurs why it should not be enforced according to the plain provisions.” What if there is good reason? Suppose an injured employee is under disability and cannot give notice?
The period within…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Nowell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Lee v. Rose's 5-10-25c StoresSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
3Cited by16 opinions
- Watkins v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Belfield v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Aldridge v. Foil Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Ball v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- Weston v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.