Neal v. Clary
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.
The only assignment of error is -to the ruling of the court below in dismissing the action for want of jurisdiction.
Ordinarily, when the pleadings in a common law tort action disclose that the parties are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act with respect to the injury involved, dismissal is proper for the Industrial Commission has exclusive jurisdiction in such cases.
In the instant case, at the time of the hearing below, not only the pleadings tended to show that the employer-employee relationship existed with respect to plaintiff’s injury,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tucker v. LowdermilkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Tscheiller v. National Weaving Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Smith v. Mecklenburg County Chapter American Red CrossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Cox v. Pitt County Transportation CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Powers v. Robeson County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Pruitt v. Knight Publishing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Morse v. CurtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- Moore v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Clark v. GASTONIA ICE CREAM COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.