Legal Opinion

Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno Müller

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 29, 1957No. Patent Appeal 6240PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention, as claimed in the single count hereinafter set forth, to the junior party.

Involved in this interference are applications No. 140,104, filed January 23, 1950, by Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell (hereinafter referred to as Binstead) and No. 155,136, filed April 11, 1950 by Hans Littmann and Brüno Müller (hereinafter referred to as Littmann). Littmann being the junior party and the applications being co-pending, Littmann…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. Brand v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. Interchemical Corporation v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1956
  4. Hilding Olof Vidar Bergstrom, and Karl Gustaf Trobeck v. George H. Tomlinson and George H. Tomlinson IICourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In re HoganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Kennecott Corporation v. Kyocera International, Inc. And Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Wagoner v. BargerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. Langer v. KaufmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. Application of Harry Louis Yale, Francis Alexander Sowinski and Jack BernsteinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API