In re Hogan
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Appeals affirming various rejections, under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102, 103, 112 (first paragraph), and 132, of claims 13-15 in appellants’ application No. 181,185 filed September 16,1971 (the 1971 application) for “Solid Polymers of Olefins.”1 A main issue involves use of a “later state of the art” as evidence to support a rejection.
The 1971 application is said to be a continuation of application No. 648,364 filed June 23,1967 (the 1967 application), in turn a “divisional” of application No. 558,530…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Raytheon Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Roper Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Transco Products Inc. v. Performance Contracting, Inc. And Performance Contracting Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.