Legal Opinion

Hilding Olof Vidar Bergstrom, and Karl Gustaf Trobeck v. George H. Tomlinson and George H. Tomlinson II

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 30, 1955No. Patent Appeal 6066PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarding to appellees priority of invention of the subject matter embraced in a count which reads as follows:

“The process of regenerating black liquor in the sulfate pulp process, which comprises subjecting the liquor as it comes from the cooking step and before any substantial evaporation thereof to a separate oxidizing step wherein it is intimately contacted with air at an elevated temperature below the boiling point of the liquor, said liquor being subjected to said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of SmythCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  2. Abbott v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. Harnsberger v. YoukerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  4. Dreyfus v. LilienfeldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  5. Goldsmith v. MihalyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API