Legal Opinion
Interchemical Corporation v. Watson
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 11, 1956No. Civ. A. 4434-53PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilkin, District Judge
(by designation).
In this action, brought under the provisions of Section 145 of Title 35 United States Code, the plaintiff, as assignee, seeks a judgment authorizing the defendant to grant plaintiff Letters Patent on claims 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 13, 14 and 15 of the application of Arthur Booth, Serial No. 70,398, filed .January 11, 1949.
The Booth application describes a printing paste for use in textile decoration, which comprises a pigmented dispersion of a substantially insoluble rubbery copolymer of acrylonitrile and butadiene, and a volatile, water-immiscible organic liquid. The purpose of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Sun Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Hansgirg v. KemmerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Thompson v. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Oliver Machinery Co. v. GellmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Bendix Corp. v. Balax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Chemithon Corporation v. Procter & Gamble CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
- Armour and Company v. Wilson & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.