Application of Harry Louis Yale, Francis Alexander Sowinski and Jack Bernstein
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 12, 13 and 18 in appellants’ application 1 for “Trifluoromethyl Phenothiazines.”
An understanding of the issues here will be facilitated by setting forth a summary of the proceedings leading to this appeal.
Appellants’ application, along with applications of three other parties, was involved in two interference proceedings in the Patent Office relating to priority of invention of certain piperazinyl-lower alkyl-trifluoromethylphenothiazines, useful as tranquilizers.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Application of Robert J. HarryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In re GreggCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Avery v. ChaseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Application of David Taub, Norman L. Wendler and Harry L. SlatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Application of Rudolf WiechertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In re BassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, Ulrich Horlein and Wolfgang Wirth. Application of Ulrich Horlein, Wolfgang Wirth and Klaus Heinz RisseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Sutter Products Company v. Pettibone Mulliken CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- In re BaxterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.