Legal Opinion

Kennecott Corporation v. Kyocera International, Inc. And Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 22, 1987No. 87-1151PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Kennecott Corporation appeals the final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, 1 in which the district court granted summary judgment to the defendants Kyocera International and Kyoto Ceramic Co., Ltd. (together “Kyocera”), holding that United States Patent No. 4,179,299 (“the ’299 patent”) is invalid in terms of the “on sale” bar of 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). Ken-necott’s claim of patent infringement was dismissed. We reverse.

The Controlling Question

The judgment of invalidity turned on the sole question of whether the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Litton Industrial Products, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Solid State Systems Corp., Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. Application of Heinrich Ruschig, Walter Aumuller, Gerhard Korger, Hans Wagner, Josef Scholz and Alfred BanderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. In Re Leslie N. Wilder, James C. Whitney and Gary G. Matison, and Lanier Business Products, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Technicon Instruments Corporation v. Coleman Instruments Corporation and American Hospital Supply CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  5. Technicon Instruments Corp. v. Coleman Instruments, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Robert L. Mendenhall, and Cmi Corporation v. Cedarapids, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. Applied Medical Resources Corporation v. United States Surgical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  5. Therma-Tru Corporation v. Peachtree Doors Inc., Acme Sliding Door, Inc. D/B/A Edwards Wholesale, and Village Door, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API