Legal Opinion
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. EMC Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 10, 2004No. C 02-04709 JF, 169PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISQUALIFY EXPERT WITNESS 1
FOGEL, District Judge.
Defendant moves to disqualify Plaintiffs’ expert witness. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. The Court has read the moving and responding papers and has considered the oral arguments presented by counsel at the hearing on May 10, 2004. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Hewlett-Packard Company et al. (“HP”) filed suit against Defendant EMC Corporation (“EMC”) on September 30, 2002, alleging infringement of several of the claims of seven patents. EMC counterclaimed, alleging that…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erickson v. Newmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- Nikkal Industries, Ltd. v. Salton, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- In Re Pelvic mesh/gynecare Lit.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- LaCroix v. Bic Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Rhodes v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2008
- Mullins v. Comprehensive Pediatric, 07 Ma 144 (3-19-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.