Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided June 10, 2008No. Civil Action 6:06-cv-00530PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN, Chief Judge.

Pending before the court is the plaintiffs’ Motion to Disqualify Dr. Elizabeth L. Anderson as an expert witness for the defendant [Docket 170], For reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED.

I. Background

Without the work of scientists, whose ranks include those working in universities, governmental agencies, and corporations, our country would not be the leader in science and technology that it is today. Our health and progress depend on scientific inquiry, and those devoted to the sciences should be commended for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Tessier v. Plastic Surgery Specialists, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
  3. Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  4. Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  5. Mayer v. DellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brainchild Surgical Devices, LLC v. CPA Global LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  2. Daddono v. KnightDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  3. Doe v. Rockingham County School BoardDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023
  4. Estate of Peyton Teutsch v. Cosmos Vandeven MdMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. McCoy v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API