Legal Opinion
Nikkal Industries, Ltd. v. Salton, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 11, 1988No. 87 Civ. 6092 (CHT)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
This case involves advertising claims for home ice cream makers. Plaintiff Nikkal Industries, Ltd. (“Nikkal”) filed a complaint against defendant Saltón, Inc. (“Salton”) alleging that defendant’s advertising violated the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (1982 & Supp.1987), and sections 349 and 350 of the New York General Business Law (McKinney 1968 & Supp.1987). Defendant made counterclaims asserting that Nikkal’s advertising violated the same statutory provisions. Nikkal’s complaint seeks damages, and preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. Judge Leonard B.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- In Re Salvatore Bonanno, and Proceedings Before October 1964 Additional Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- McAllan v. Von EssenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
- R.F.M.A.S., Inc. v. SoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- MacNamara v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.