Legal Opinion

Dodge v. Wilkinson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1983No. 6518PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal arises from a gold claim dispute. John L. Dodge sought land to mine in the Fairbanks area. In the fall of 1977, he located 1 several claims on federal public land at the headwaters of Miller Creek, above an area on the creek where Frederick D. Wilkinson was operating a substantial placer mining venture. Dodge named his claims P, R, 0, F, I, and T, the “PROFIT” group.

Dodge met Wilkinson at Wilkinson’s mining operation that fall and told him that he had staked the claims. Wilkinson contended that he had located claims on October 3, 1976, in the same area. Wilkinson’s new…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
  2. Erwin v. PeregoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  3. McEvoy v. HymanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1885
  4. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Perigo v. ErwinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Utah · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miscovich v. TryckAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. AU International, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kile v. BelisleAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Teck American Incorporated and State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources v. Valhalla Mining, LLC, Teck American Incorporated and State of Alaska, Department of Natural Resources v. Valhalla Mining, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Au Intern. v. Dept. of Nat. Res.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API