Legal Opinion

Peter v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1975No. 2185PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOOCHEVER, -Justice.

Upon being charged with the crime of burglary in a dwelling, 1 Donald Ungarook Peter moved to suppress from evidence certain items taken from him at the time of his arrest and a statement given by him to Barrow, Alaska police officer Sage. The trial court denied the motion and a petition for review was filed. At the heart of Peter’s motion is the broader question of whether the Uniform Alcoholism and Intoxication Treatment Act (hereinafter Uniform Act) as adopted by Alaska in AS 47.37 repealed by implication 13 AAC 02.175(c), which prohibits a person from being upon…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. University of Alaska v. National Aircraft Leasing, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Reeves v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Schraff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Hafling v. Inlandboatmen's Union of the PacificAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API