Legal Opinion

Kile v. Belisle

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1988No. S-1811, S-1835PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case involves a dispute over title to certain mining claims known as the “Squaw/Baby Creek” claims and the “Canyon Creek” claims, located in the vicinity of Boundary, Alaska. Alvin Kile and Leslie Maxwell assert title and ownership as holders of unpatented federal mining claims. 1 Robert Belisle, Stella Lavender, and Darrell Pelkey (hereinafter state claimants) assert title and ownership as holders of un-patented state mining claims. The trial court held that the state claimants had title to the Squaw/Baby Creek claims, and that Maxwell had title to the Canyon Creék claims. Kile…

3Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Wilbur v. United States Ex Rel. KrushnicSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Benson Mining & Smelting Co. v. Alta Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Miscovich v. TryckAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Welcome v. JenningsAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. AU International, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Brooks Range Exploration Co. v. GordonAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API