Legal Opinion
Hart v. Howell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 13, 1938No. 28004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a motion for new trial. The action was filed by F. S. Hart against Edna L. Howell to quiet title. Hart claimed title under a resale tax deed. Howell filed an answer and cross-petition, claiming possession and set up title under a quitclaim deed from the Capitol Realty Company. Plaintiff dismissed his action and filed an answer to the cross-petition of the defendant, but asked no affirmative relief. Trial was had to the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered on February 3, 1937, denying the defendant any relief on her cross-petition. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Philip Carey Co. v. VickersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Smith v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Nichols v. BonaparteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tillman v. TillmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Gripe v. GrievesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Carpenter v. BuellesfeldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Franklin v. Hunt Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Higgs v. Muskogee Iron Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.