Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Hunt Dry Goods Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1942No. 30027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

In this case the plaintiff sued the defendant in the district court of Muskogee county for damages for the loss of furs in transit. Summons was regularly served on the defendant. The answer date was correctly fixed as March 7, 1940. No answer was filed nor appearance made within the time required. On March 9, 1940, the defendant being in default, the plaintiff without offering any testimony took a default judgment for the amount sued for. On March 12th the plaintiff, conceiving its judgment to be irregular, orally moved the court to set aside the default judgment entered on March 9th. This…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Pulaski Oil Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Todd v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Lindsey v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Montague v. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. Chimney Rock Ltd. Partnership v. Hongkong Bank of CanadaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Busby v. EavesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Smith v. PierceCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API