Legal Opinion

Philip Carey Co. v. Vickers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 22, 1913No. 4755PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Error from, Superior Court, Oklahom.a County; Edward Bowes OldfieldJudge. An action by Arthur A. Vickers against the Philip Carey Company and another. From an order setting aside judgment for defendant, the defendant named brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action fox damages for personal injuries, commenced by the defendant in error, Arthur A. Vickers, against the plaintiff in error, the Philip Carey Company, and the defendant J. A. Johnson. No summons seems to have been served on Johnson, and his connection with the case is merely nominal. One of the defenses of the Philip Carey Company was that on August 25, 1910, it made a full and complete settlement of all claims of said plaintiff against the defendant arising out of the accident described in his petition; that at the time of making said settlement the plaintiff executed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goddard v. OrdwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Willson v. CleavelandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Poff v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Loring v. FrueSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Schepp v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Vickers v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Levi v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API