Carpenter v. Buellesfeld
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a motion for a new trial.
The action was brought by plaintiff Buellesfeld upon a promissory note executed and delivered to him by defendants. The defense pleaded was lack of consideration. The note grew out of a series of transactions between the parties in which three promissory notes were involved. The first note was made by Dr. M. E. Buellesfeld, the father of defendant Helen S. Carpenter and brother of plaintiff, upon which plaintiff was an accommodation endorser. Dr. Buellesfeld died leaving this note unpaid. The second note was signed by F. J.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Oklahoma City-Ada-Atoka Ry. Co. v. SwinkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Hart v. HowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chrysler Corporation v. Walter E. Allen, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Cooke v. SinopouloSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Hays Trucking Co. v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Benedict Bros. Const. Co. v. DavoultSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Morgan v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.