Legal Opinion

Bowes v. Lakeside Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1973No. 43961PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Kathryn L. Bowes, widow of Hillford G. Bowes, claims entitlement to the face amount of a group life insurance policy written by defendant California Life Insurance Company (hereafter California Life) for the employees of defendant Lakeside Industries, Inc. (hereafter Lakeside), as master policyholder, asserting that Bowes was at the time of his death on December 18, 1969, a full-time employee of Lakeside. Alternatively, in the event her contractual claim against defendant California Life fails, she makes a claim for a like amount against defendant Lakeside, asserting fraud…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boseman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Elfstrom v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Duval v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  4. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co. v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Clauson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Paulson v. Western Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, IowaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Hedlund v. Monumental General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Golt v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. Golt v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API