Legal Opinion
Golt v. Aetna Life Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 1999No. 98-35034PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.
I
Pursuant to Rule 44(c) of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure, we respectfully request the Montana Supreme Court to exercise its discretion to adjudicate the following questions of Montana law:
1.Does accidental death coverage, when provided either as part of a separate group accident insurance policy, or as part of a “Group Life and Accident and Health Insurance Policy,” fall within Montana’s statutory definition of life insurance for the purpose of determining an insured’s conversion rights? See MCA §§ 33-1-207 (definition of life insurance), 33-20-1209…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nautilus Insurance v. First National InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1992
- Bass v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Norby v. Bankers Life Co. of Des Moines, IowaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Bowes v. Lakeside Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Life Insurance Co. of North America v. Klingler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Golt v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999