Legal Opinion
Enterprise Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation v. Enterprise Holdings, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 28, 2012No. 11-2883PublishedCited by 176 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GARTH, Circuit Judge.
The only issue on this appeal is whether Enterprise Holdings, Inc., 1 (“Enterprise Holdings”), which is the sole stockholder of thirty eight domestic subsidiaries, is a joint employer of the subsidiaries’ assistant managers within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). In order to answer this question, we must define the contours of the term “joint employer.”
The District Court, in a comprehensive opinion, 2 held that Enterprise Holdings, Inc. was not a joint employer. 3 In doing so, the District Court determined that the standard to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. RosenwasserSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by176 opinions
- Patricia Thompson v. Real Estate Mortgage NetworkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Matthew Faush v. Tuesday MorningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Mario Salinas v. Commercial Interiors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- Teed v. Thomas & Betts Power Solutions, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Roman v. Guapos III, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
171 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.