Pendley v. Ayers
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
The question before us is: Did the trial court err in denying defendant’s motion to set aside default where the record shows that at the hearing on said motion, the trial court found defendant to be negligent in failing to deliver the copies of summons and complaint to either her insurance representative or her attorney and that defendant has alleged facts, which if true, would constitute a meritorious defense? We hold that error occurred for the reasons that follow.
The official comment of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 55, of the Rules of Civil Procedure states:
“Note next that the delineation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Elias v. PitucciDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Teal v. King Farms Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
- Welch v. KearnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. R & G Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stone v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Bailey v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Estate of Teel Ex Rel. Naddeo v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Moore v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Decker v. HOMES, INC./CONSTRUCTION MGMT.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.