Legal Opinion

Moore v. Sullivan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 1996No. COA95-1075PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendants first argue that the trial court erred in entering a default judgment against them because defendants’ answer was filed before the trial court made an entry of default against them. We agree.

In its 8 July 1993 “Entry of Default,” the trial court stated that it was entering a judgment by default against defendants. We have previously clarified that when one party fails to file an answer and the trial court enters a judgment determining the issue of liability but ordering a trial on the issue of damages, the judgment is only an entry of default rather than a default…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Peebles v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Bailey v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Harris v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Pendley v. AyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harlow v. Voyager Communications VSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Decker v. HOMES, INC./CONSTRUCTION MGMT.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Jackson v. CulbrethCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Stark Truss Co. v. Superior Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  5. B. Kelley Enterprises, Inc. v. Vitacost.com, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API