Moore v. Sullivan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Defendants first argue that the trial court erred in entering a default judgment against them because defendants’ answer was filed before the trial court made an entry of default against them. We agree.
In its 8 July 1993 “Entry of Default,” the trial court stated that it was entering a judgment by default against defendants. We have previously clarified that when one party fails to file an answer and the trial court enters a judgment determining the issue of liability but ordering a trial on the issue of damages, the judgment is only an entry of default rather than a default…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Peebles v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Bailey v. GoodingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Harris v. CarterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Pendley v. AyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by11 opinions
- Harlow v. Voyager Communications VSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Decker v. HOMES, INC./CONSTRUCTION MGMT.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Jackson v. CulbrethCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Stark Truss Co. v. Superior Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- B. Kelley Enterprises, Inc. v. Vitacost.com, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.