Legal Opinion

Stone v. Martin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1984No. 8310SC817PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant Martin asserts that plaintiffs’ appeal should not be heard at this time because it is interlocutory and does not affect a substantial right. While the argument is not properly raised as a cross-assignment of error pursuant to N.C. R. App. P. 10(d), we choose to address it.

This Court has authority to issue a writ of certiorari to review a trial court order “when no right of appeal from an interlocutory order exists.” N.C. R. App. P. 21(a)(1). That authority was exercised by another panel of this Court with respect to the matters presented. Its grant of certiorari is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Calloway v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. North Carolina National Bank v. Virginia Carolina BuildersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Peebles v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Peebles v. MooreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Roane-Barker v. Southeastern Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Taylor v. Taylor Products Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Iverson v. TM One, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. First Financial Insurance v. Commercial Coverage, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Crook v. KRC Management Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API