Teal v. King Farms Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff instituted this action for personal injuries on July 15, 1955. The summons was served on July 28. On September 2, or about two weeks after answer and appearance were due, a default was entered, on the plaintiff’s motion, against the defendant for failure to appear, plead or otherwise defend. On September 14, the defendant moved to set aside the default.
A default, but no judgment, having been entered, the defendant’s motion is governed by the first clause of Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. rule 55(c), 28 U.S.C. which is “For good cause shown the court may set aside…
2Cited by21 opinions
- In re Arthur Treacher's Franchisee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Parsons v. Consolidated Gas Supply Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- Trueblood v. Grayson Shops of Tennessee, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1963
- United States v. Topeka Livestock Auction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975
- Whaley v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.