Hall Oil Co. v. Barquin
Wyoming Supreme Court
ERROR to the District Court of Fremont County, Hon. Ralph W. Kimball, Judge. Action by James Barquin and another against Hall Oil Company and others. There was a judgment for defendants and plaintiffs bring error. Heard on motion to strike assignments of error from the petition, to dismiss and to strike motions and rulings from the bill of exceptions and correct the bill. No briefs were filed by either party.,
1Opinion of the Court
PotteR, Chief Justice.
This cause is here on error, and has been heard on a motion of defendants in error expressing several objects which may be grouped and stated as follows: 1. To strike from the petition in .error each assignment of error and dismiss 'the proceedings. 2. To strike from the bill of exceptions certain motions and the recital of the ruling and order upon ' each of them and the exception thereto. 3. To correct the bill in certain other particulars.
It appears from the record that the action was brought in the court below by the defendants in error as plaintiffs against the four…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blaisdell v. SteinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Callahan v. HouckWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
- Board of Commissioners v. ShaffnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1902
- Riordan v. HortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1908
- Kershner v. Trinidad Mill. & Min. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miracle v. Barker Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Leach v. FrederickWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
- Stein v. SchunemanWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Diamond Cattle Co. v. ClarkWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Simmons v. ParrentWyoming Supreme Court · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.