Legal Opinion
Kershner v. Trinidad Mill. & Min. Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1920No. 2386PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Taos County; Leib,. Judge. Action between William D. Kershner and the Trinidad Milling & Mining Company and others. Judgment for the latter, and the former -appeals. On motion to strike from the Kies all the appellant’s assignments of error.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION .OP THE COURT.
PARKER, C. J.
[1] This is a motion to strike from the files all of the assignments of error of appellant. Assignments 1 to 12 relate to tbe alleged erroneous admission of evidence, of which No. 2 is an example as follows:
"(2) The district court erred in admitting, over the objection of plaintiff, Defendant’s Exhibits A and B, as shown on pages 54 and 55 of transcript.”
Assignments 13 to 33 relate to alleged erroneous findings of fact and conclusions of law, of which Nos. 13, 21, 25, and 27 are examples, as follows:
“(13) The district court erred in making finding No. 4 of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Bleidorn v. Pilot Mountain C. & M. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1910
- Nord v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Vaill v. McPhailSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hall Oil Co. v. BarquinWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Morrison v. First National Bank of TaosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
- Lea County Fair Ass'n v. ElkanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948