Leach v. Frederick
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Kimball, Justice.
This is an action on a promissory note signed by the defendants, payable to R. E. Wilkinson. Plaintiff claimed to be the holder in due course by endorsement. The defendants claimed that their signatures to the note had been procured by false and fraudulent representations; that the note was never delivered for the purpose of giving effect thereto, and that the plaintiff was not a holder in due course. The case was tried without a jury, and the judgment on a general finding was for the defendants. The plaintiff brings the case here by appeal.
In the answer, the fraud in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cawthon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Bitzer v. BoboSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Borough of Hanover v. Hanover Sewer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Hall Oil Co. v. BarquinWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Jones v. DevereuxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schaffer v. Standard Timber Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Claughton v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Miracle v. Barker Et Ux.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Lester A. York v. John P. JamesWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
- McCoy v. CleggWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.