Legal Opinion

Miracle v. Barker Et Ux.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1943No. 2238PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice.

This is an action brought by F. E. Miracle, assignee of T. Leon Howard and John N. Lipscomb, surgeons, to recover from the defendants Lewis Barker and Ida Barker, his wife, a balance of $250 claimed to be due on an account and the interest thereon. The petition alleges that the defendants are husband and wife; that Dr. Howard and Dr. Lipscomb are duly licensed physicians and surgeons in the State of Colorado; that on or about October 12, 1930, and on or about October 18, 1930, Drs. Howard and Lipscomb performed professional services for the defendant Lewis Barker, at his…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Head v. HargraveSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Lawther Grain Co. v. WinnifordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Fowle v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  5. Stone v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. George Lee Mims, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Phelps v. Woodward Con. Co., N. Util.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Culver v. SekulichWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Mitchell v. VondraWyoming Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API