Beggs v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. Emmett Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. E. J. Dole, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action in claim and delivery and, incidentally, for an injunction to prevent the defendants from selling or disposing of the personal property described in the complaint.
The plaintiff was awarded judgment, restoring to her the possession of the property in dispute and enjoining the defendants from “interfering with or selling or advertising for sale the said personal property or any part thereof.”
This appeal, supported by a bill of exceptions, is prosecuted by the defendants from said judgment.
The defendants, Smith and Rasmussen, are, respectively, sheriff of the county of Sonoma…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Paine v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Caruthers v. HensleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Claudius v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sidney v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Peterson v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Englert v. Ivac Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Wood v. GirotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Peerless Insurance & Brokerage Co. v. Dwyer Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.