State ex rel. Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Ass'n v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.
CPPA asserts in its propositions of law that the court of appeals erred in concluding that most of the requested PCIR records were exempt from disclosure despite Officer Pettry’s agreement that she will not file an appeal or petition for postconviction relief. We agree with CPPA’s contention and reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Once they are determined to be exempt as trial-preparation records or work product, records continue to be exempt until all criminal proceedings are completed. State ex rel. Steckman v. Jackson (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 420, 639 N.E.2d 83, paragraph four of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. WLWT-TV5 v. LeisOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Natalina Food Co. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State ex rel. Calvary v. City of Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Calvary v. Upper ArlingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of MentorOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.