Legal Opinion

State ex rel. WLWT-TV5 v. Leis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1997No. 96-141PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

WLWT seeks a writ of mandamus compelling respondents to provide access to the requested records. Mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel compliance with R.C. 149.43, Ohio’s Public Records Act. State ex rel. Master v. Cleveland (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 23, 28, 661 N.E.2d 180, 184 (“Master I ”). “Exceptions to disclosure are strictly construed against the custodian of the public records, and the burden to establish an exception is on the custodian.” State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State Univ. (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 245, 247, 643 N.E.2d 126, 128.

Respondents contend that the records are exempt from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Steckman v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Dillery v. IcsmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Wallace v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State ex rel. Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API