Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Natalina Food Co. v. Ohio Civil Rights Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1990No. 89-1399PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, relator-appellant, Natalina Food Company (“Natalina”), seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent respondentappellee, the Ohio Civil Rights Commission (“OCRC”), from conducting an administrative hearing on an OCRC complaint. The OCRC complaint alleges that Natalina discharged Paul S. O’Brien, Sr. because of his age and handicap in violation of R.C. 4112.02(A). Natalina contends that the OCRC lacks jurisdiction to decide O’Brien’s discrimination claim because O’Brien is a West Virginia resident whose employment occurred principally in that state, not in Ohio.

The material facts…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State ex rel. Adams v. GusweilerOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State ex rel. Republic Steel Corp. v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State ex rel. Johnson v. County CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Connor v. McGoughOhio Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Management, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Guillory v. Dept. of Rehab. Corr., 07ap-861 (5-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Minor v. EschenOhio Supreme Court · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API