Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of Mentor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2000No. 99-1552PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

Mandamus: Spetrino Investigative Records

Relators assert that they are entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to provide them with access to the Spetrino investigative records under R.C. 149.43, Ohio’s Public Records Act. R.C. 149.43 mandates full access to all public records upon request unless the requested records fall within one of the specified exemptions. State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State Univ. (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 535, 538, 721 N.E.2d 1044, 1047. In fact, public employee personnel records, including personnel records of police officers reflecting discipline, are…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Master v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Pennington v. GundlerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State Ex Rel. Rocker v. Guernsey County Sheriff's OfficeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State ex rel. Dillery v. IcsmanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Lanham v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State ex rel. WBNS TV, Inc. v. DuesOhio Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API