Legal Opinion

Hawks v. Walsh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1936No. 23235PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

In the trial court the plaintiffs, J. M. Walsh and Minnie Walsh, instituted this action, numbered 10943, against the State Highway Commissioners for damages to real property resulting from the method of construction of highway improvements, and alleged to cause the plaintiffs’ property to be inaccessible and difficult of approach, and to be depreciated in value, to plaintiffs’ damage in the sum of $10,000, in addition to the value of the property theretofore condemned by the state in condemnation proceedings.

In a former action, numbered 9927, wherein the state was plaintiff, and J. M. Walsh…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kawananakoa v. PolyblankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Dougherty v. VidalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Wilkinson v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. HeissIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Westinghouse Elec. & Mfg. Co. v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. BoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Henry v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. State Highway Commission v. Green-Boots Const. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API