Legal Opinion

Bourn v. Hart

California Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1892No. 14545PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus to the state board of examiners. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.

This is an original proceeding, /i wherein the petitioner asks this court to issue a writ of mandamus directed to the defendants, as members of the state board of examiners, commanding them to allow his claim against the state for the sum of ten thousand dollars, in accordance with the provisions of an act of the legislature, the first section of which, and the only one necessary to a proper understanding of this case, is as follows: —

“ Sec. 1. The sum of ten thousand ($10,000) dollars is hereby appropriated out of any moneys in the general fund of the state treasury not otherwise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Lewis v. . the StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Clodfelter v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Riddoch v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Melvin v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Denning v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Chapman v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API