Legal Opinion
Frederick F. Glass v. William C. De Roo
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided November 30, 1956No. Patent Appeal 6298PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellees. Ap-pellees move to dismiss this appeal on the ground that appellant’s reasons of appeal fail to raise any question on which this court has jurisdiction to pass.
Appellant bases his appeal on twelve reasons of appeal which it is unnecessary for us to set forth. Appellees, in moving to dismiss, have analyzed these reasons, pointing out that they all relate, directly or indirectly, to the question of patentability and to no other question. Appellant does not deny this and his lengthy…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hoover Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gowen v. HendryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Jeffrey Mfg. Co. v. Kingsland, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Leslie C. Case v. Cpc International, Inc., and Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, Co-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Robert C. Woofter v. Vernon E. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Palmer v. DudzikCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Sperry Rand Corp. v. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.