Legal Opinion
Application of Kyrides
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 11, 1947No. Patent Appeal 5267PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLAND, Associate Judge.
After allowing claims numbered 6 and 20 in appellant’s application for a patent for “improvements in Plastic Compositions of Matter,” the Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office finally rejected claims 1, 2, 3, 5, 11, 12, 13, 15 and 18, the only remaining claims in the application except for certain claims which were drawn to a non-elected species and depend upon the allowance of a generic claim. The Board of Appeals affirmed the examiner’s rejection and appellant has here appealed from the board’s decision.
The application at bar is concerned with plastic…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ball & Roller Bearing Co. v. F. C. Sanford Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- In Re SteenbockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Conover v. DownsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Kyrides v. AndersenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- Prichard v. SetzlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Alex ZletzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Fontijn v. OkamotoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.