Application of Klaus Heinz Risse, Ulrich Horlein and Wolfgang Wirth. Application of Ulrich Horlein, Wolfgang Wirth and Klaus Heinz Risse
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
These are consolidated appeals from decisions of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejections of claim 9 of appellants’ parent application serial No. 608,170, filed September 5, 1956, and claims 44 and 47 of continuation-in-part application serial No. 26,707, filed May 4, 1960, both entitled “Phenothiazine Derivatives.”
The invention relates to novel acyl phenothiazines which possess excellent ganglion-blocking, hypotensive, potentiating and spasmolytic activity and are therapeutically useful as blood pressure reducing agents, sedatives, and antiemetics.
Claim 9 of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Application of Josef FriedCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- In re GreggCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Application of Walter Grimme, Werner Keil and Heinrich SchmitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of David Taub, Norman L. Wendler and Harry L. SlatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- Application of Carl A. Lukach, Setha G. Olson and Harold M. SpurlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In Re Alex ZletzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- In re BassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.