Legal Opinion
In Re Innotron Diagnostics
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 27, 1986No. Misc. 111PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This petition for mandamus seeks to overturn an order of the district court separating issues for trial. We deny the petition.
On April 1, 1985, Innotron Diagnostics (Innotron) sued Abbott Laboratories (Abbott) in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, No. 85-2207, alleging that Abbott’s marketing activities (contracts tying its reagents to its analyzer, bundling its reagents with other products, and manipulating its analyzer software to exclude Innotron’s reagents) violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (1982).…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Spencer, White & Prentis Incorporated of Connecticut v. Pfizer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- In Re Bendectin Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Calmar, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Light v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Charles R. Christianson and International Trade Services, Inc., Etc. v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Spraytex, Inc. v. Djs&t and Homax CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.