Moore v. Kaiser Permanente
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.
Plaintiff in this medical malpractice action appeals from a summary judgment for defendant doctors and Kaiser Permanente, the professional corporation of which they are members. He alleges that he suffered a permanent disabling back injury because defendants, who treated him following an on the job injury, were negligent in diagnosing and treating his condition and in advising him that he could return to his bus driving job after a period of time off. He argues that he raised sufficient issues of material fact to defeat defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.
Defendants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy ConsultantsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy ConsultantsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by15 opinions
- Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Hinchman v. UC Market, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Stotler v. MTD Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Piskorski v. Ron Tonkin Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.