Legal Opinion

Stotler v. MTD Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 30, 1997No. 9504-02453; CA A92758PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*407ARMSTRONG, J.

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendants in a products liability and negligence action arising from injuries that he suffered while assembling a lawnmower. He argues that the trial court incorrectly held that the affidavit that he submitted under ORCP 47 E was insufficient to create an issue of fact about whether the lawnmower was defective or defendants were negligent. We reverse and remand.

Defendants moved for summary judgment, with supporting evidence, on the ground that the lawnmower was not unreasonably dangerous and that defendants were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Moore v. Kaiser PermanenteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hinchman v. UC Market, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Cunningham v. Happy Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Metropolitan Property & Casualty v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Brown v. Chas. H. Lilly Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. Piskorski v. Ron Tonkin Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API