Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy Consultants
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
The defendants in this medical malpractice action appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeals which held that the trial court erred in allowing the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the trial court judgment in favor of the defendants.
The plaintiffs 1 sued the defendant doctors, the professional corporation of which the doctors were members and the hospital for which they were agents in connection with alleged injurious treatment. The doctors administered radiation treatments to pláintiff Deanna Tiedemann who alleged that the treatments…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- W. R. Chamberlin & Co. v. Northwestern Agencies Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Chadwick v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Ketchup v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Hendgen v. Forest Grove Community HospitalCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Arena v. GingrichOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Plemel v. WalterOregon Supreme Court · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.