Legal Opinion
Piskorski v. Ron Tonkin Toyota, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 27, 2002No. 9811-08218; A109526PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Plaintiff was injured in a car accident. She sued the other driver, Nicholas Hayes, and his employer, Ron Tonkin Toyota, Inc. The trial court entered judgment in Tonkin’s favor after ruling on summary judgment that Tonkin was neither directly nor vicariously liable for Hayes’ acts. We affirm.
Because this case arises on Tonkin’s summary judgment motion, we state the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff. Brownstein, Rask, Arenz v. Pearson, 166 Or App 120, 122, 997 P2d 300 (2000). Hayes was a sales manager for Tonkin. He was responsible for negotiating sales, appraising used cars,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Palmer v. Van Petten Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Mathews v. Federated Service InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Moore v. Kaiser PermanenteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Stotler v. MTD Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hinchman v. UC Market, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Whalen v. American Medical Response Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- LaVoie v. Power Auto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- DeBAUGH v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.