Legal Opinion

Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy Consultants

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1985No. 135832; CA A31402PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

The plaintiffs in this medical malpractice action appeal from summary judgments for the defendant doctors, the professional corporation of which they are members and the hospital for which they were agents in connection with the injurious treatment. The doctors administered radiation treatments to plaintiff Deanna Tiedemann. Plaintiffs allege that the treatments were negligently performed and that the doctors failed to apprise the patient of material risks entailed in the procedure.

The doctors moved for summary judgment on the basis of an affidavit of one of them, defendant M. J. Thompson.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bank of Oregon v. Independent News, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Wood v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. May v. Josephine Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moore v. Kaiser PermanenteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API