Legal Opinion

Electro-Metallurgical Co. v. Krupp Nirosta Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 30, 1941No. 7471PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves a suit under Revised Statutes § 4915, 35 U.S.C.A. § 63, for a decree entitling the plaintiff, Electro-Metallurgical Company, to receive a patent for the invention specified in claims 1, 2 and 9 of a patent awarded to Paul Schaf-meister, who assigned his rights therein to the defendant, Krupp Nirosta Company, Inc. Schafmeister was originally joined as a party defendant but the bill of complaint was dismissed as to him upon his filing a disclaimer in the court below.

The plaintiff, Electro-Metallurgical Company, is the owner of patent application Serial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Automatic Weighing Mach. Co. v. Pneumatic Scale Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1909
  3. Carson v. American Smelting & Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  4. Townsend v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  5. Stilz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Hygrade Sylvania CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1944
  2. Kraft Foods Co. v. Walther Dairy ProductsDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1954
  3. Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated v. Hughes Aircraft Company, and General Instrument CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Searle v. GlarumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  5. Sydney Archer v. Domenick PapaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API