Legal Opinion
Sydney Archer v. Domenick Papa
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 15, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6400PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention of the subject matter of Interference No. 86,-729 to the senior party Domenick Papa, appellee here.
The issue of the interference is defined in the following count:
A compound of the group consisting of acids of the formula
wherein It is an alkyl radical of 1 to 3 carbon atoms and their non-toxic alkali metal and amine salts.”
Papa is involved in the interference on application Serial No. 268,685, filed January 28, 1952, which date he relies upon for priority. Archer, appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mason v. HepburnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1898
- Frederick F. Blicke v. Gino R. TrevesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Electro-Metallurgical Co. v. Krupp Nirosta Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- Electro Metallurgical Co. v. Krupp Nirosta Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1940
- Hedenskoog v. BackusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Application of John A. Nelson and Anthony C. ShabicaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of David Neville Kirk and Vladimir PetrowCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Marshall B. Alpert v. Harvey L. SlatinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Rey-Bellet v. EngelhardtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Edward L. Engelhardt v. Claude I. Judd, Alexander E. Drukker and John H. BielCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.