Legal Opinion

Bell Telephone Laboratories, Incorporated v. Hughes Aircraft Company, and General Instrument Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 25, 1977No. 77-1061PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MARIS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal by Hughes Aircraft Corporation (herein “Hughes”) from a final judgment of the district court in favor of the plaintiff in an action brought by Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. (herein “Bell”) against Hughes and General Instrument Corporation to establish priority of inven tion as among their conflicting patents. Judgment by default having been entered against General Instrument Corporation, it is no longer involved in the case. Bell and Hughes hold interfering patents claiming the same invention, the Bell patent being Patent No.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gordon Gould v. Arthur L. Schawlow and Charles H. TownesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Milford A. Campbell, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant v. Spectrum Automation Company, Defendant-Counter-PlaintiffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. Electro-Metallurgical Co. v. Krupp Nirosta Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  4. Allen v. BlaisdellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  5. Bennett v. SerotaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
  2. Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
  3. Grefco, Inc. v. Kewanee Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1980
  4. United States v. KirkseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  5. Rosera v. International Harvester Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API