Dean v. Conrad
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Painter, Judge.
We find ourselves confronted with an odd issue of first impression in Ohio 1 — whether the language that the Workers’ Compensation Act shall be “liberally construed” in favor of employees 2 may be included in a jury instruction. We find no Ohio decisions directly on point, and no reported decisions at all. Like many issues that seem to be of first impression in the appellate courts, this one may be so because no one ever thought to raise it before. And properly so, because the language is a rule of statutory construction directed to' courts, not to juries.
Appellee, William…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Becker v. Lake County Memorial Hospital WestOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Kokitka v. Ford Motor Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- Moore v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- Bahm v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Kenai v. BurnettAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schuller v. United States Steel Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2004
- Southside River-Rail Terminal, Inc. v. Crum & Forster UnderwritersOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Holmes v. Crawford Machine, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011